There is an easy way to half the amount of pollution which leads to Global
Warming, and that's to half the
number of polluters.
Scientists have recently published data which paints a stark picture of climate
change in the future, announcing that the Arctic has entered an irreversible
stage of warming.
Loss of Arctic sea ice has increased to such levels that the region is
beginning to absorb more of the suns rays which in turn is leading to
further ice melts and rising sea temperatures.
Scientists fear that the Arctic has now reached 'a point of no return' which
will inevitably lead to the melting of Greenland's land ice, this would
radically raise sea levels.
British
Green Party Principal Speaker Keith Taylor commented:
"This is the latest in a long line of wake up calls on climate change which
our leaders have so far ignored. "
"If a significant portion of Greenland's glaciers melt, sea levels could
rise by up to six metres; every low-lying city in the world will be
affected. The implications of this are simply astonishing."
"We must increase the pressure on the government to act, and act now on
climate change other wise it will simply be too little too late."
"There are radical policies out there which we know would have a huge effect
on the progress of climate change, we simply need a government bold enough
to implement them."
"The Green Party recently voted to adopt the Domestic Tradable Carbon Quotas
policy which, whilst it would be a small first step, could dramatically
reduce the UK's carbon emissions, making us a genuine world leader in terms
of tackling climate change."
Over the past 30 years, temperatures in the Arctic have been creeping up, rising
half a degree Celsius with attendant increases in glacial melting and decreases
in sea ice. Experts predict that at current levels of greenhouse gases--carbon
dioxide alone is at 375 parts per million--the earth may warm by as much as five
degrees Celsius, matching conditions roughly 130,000 years ago. Now a refined
climate model is predicting, among other things, sea level rises of as much as
20 feet, according to research results published today in the journal Science.
Modeler Bette Otto-Bliesner of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in
Boulder and paleoclimatologist Jonathan Overpeck of the University of Arizona
matched results from the Community Climate System Model and climate records
preserved in ice cores, exposed coral reefs, fossilized pollen and the chemical
makeup of shells to determine the accuracy of the computer simulation. Roughly
130,000 the Arctic enjoyed higher levels of solar radiation, leading to
increased warming in the summer and the retreat of glaciers worldwide. The model
correctly predicted the extent of the resulting Arctic ice melt, enough to raise
sea levels by roughly nine feet.
"Getting the past climate change correct in these models gives us more
confidence in their ability to predict future climate change," Otto-Bliesner
says. "These ice sheets have melted before and sea levels rose. The warmth
needed isn't that much above present conditions."
But sea levels rose as much as 20 feet 130,000 years ago and Overpeck speculates
that may have been the result of additional melting in Antarctica. After all,
the ice there is not all landlocked; some rests in the ocean and a little
warming in sea temperatures could melt it or pry it loose. And this time around,
the warming is global, rather than concentrated in the Arctic. "In the
Antarctic, all you have to do is break up the ice sheet and float it away and
that would raise sea level," he says. "It's just like throwing a bunch of ice
cubes into a full glass of water and watching the water spill over the top."
Such a sea level rise would permanently inundate low-lying lands like New
Orleans, southern Florida, Bangladesh and the Netherlands. Already sea level
rise has increased to an inch per decade, thanks to melting ice and warm water
expansion, according to Overpeck. And evidence that the Arctic is exponentially
warming continues to accumulate. Indeed, in another paper in the same issue of
Science, Goran Ekstrom of Harvard University reported a marked increase in
so-called glacial earthquakes (seismic events recorded throughout the world when
Greenland's glaciers slip past rock) since 2002. In fact, last year alone saw
twice as many quakes as in previous years, with most of that increase coming
during the summer months.
"We need to start serious measures to reduce greenhouse gases within the next
decade," Overpeck says. "If we don't do something soon, we're committed to [13
to 20 feet] of sea level rise in the future." --David Biello
Balloon Data Confirms Antarctic Warming Trend too.
Launching weather balloons has been a nearly daily habit at some Antarctic
research facilities since 1957. Carrying radiosondes--instruments that measure
atmospheric conditions such as temperature and wind speed--the balloons travel
as high as 12 miles or more. A new analysis of the past 30 years of records from
nine research stations, including Amundsen-Scott at the South Pole, reveals that
the air above the entirety of Antarctica has warmed by as much as 0.70 degree
Celsius per decade during the winter months.
John Turner of the British Antarctic Survey and his colleagues report in today's
issue of Science that this warming trend is consistent across data from multiple
stations run by multiple countries using multiple types of instruments. Previous
studies had shown that Antarctica's surface temperatures had warmed by roughly
2.5 degrees C over the last half century, but this study provides the most
complete look at atmospheric trends to date.
"The rapid surface warming of the Antarctic Peninsula and the enhanced global
warming signal over the whole continent shows the complexity of climate change,"
Turner says. "Greenhouse gases could be having a bigger impact in Antarctica
than across the rest of the world and we don't understand why."
This warming has implications for snowfall on the continent as well as the
melting of land-based ice reserves, potentially leading to global sea-level
rise, the researchers warn. Although they cannot ascribe a particular cause to
the warming, they ruled out several other potential explanations, including heat
transfer from other regions (there was no observed change in wind patterns) and
solar radiation changes (the sun is either at or below the horizon throughout
the winter months in question).
And although current computer models fail to predict this warming trend, the
scientists argue that the data is consistent with what would be expected as a
result of increasing greenhouse gases
So what is the answer?
Well we can faff around turning off a few lights and insulating our roofs.
It will help a bit, but there is only one sure way to reduce global warming and
that is to reduce the numbers of global warmers. The human population is
just too high, especially in the industrial countries where most greenhouse
gasses are produced.
For over a million years the our fight for survival cantered around reproducing
the species. Having babies was more that just a good thing to do, it was
essential to our very survival. Well in the mid 20th. century all that
changed. There are now just too many of us, using up finite resources,
producing toxic waste including greenhouse gases and threatening the destruction
of our environment.
All these global warmers need food, housing and energy in order to live
comfortable, fulfilling lives. The result of this is more global warming
for every human being who lives. We can't kill half of us off but we can
half the number of replacements we breed. So please, please, please,
resist the mindless animal urge to reproduce. Resist the urge to produce
even more global warmers!
Global warming does not happen by itself, it is caused by Global Warmers, you
and me. There is too much global warming because there are too many global
warmers! Its as simple as that.
Now I don't propose we all rush out and slit our wrists or jump off cliffs to
save our planet. What I do propose however it that we all limit the number
of replacement global warmers we breed. That we we can half the human
population within a generation. This is the ONLY way we can save our
planet and save our species.
Contributed by Jack Cox